Predictors of long-term post-thrombotic syndrome following high proximal deep vein thrombosis: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a frequent chronic complication of proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limb, but predictors of PTS are not well established. We aimed to examine predictors of PTS in patients with long-term PTS following proximal DVT. METHODS: During 2006-09, 209 patients with a first time acute upper femoral or iliofemoral DVT were randomized to receive either additional catheter-directed thrombolysis or conventional therapy alone. In 2017, the 170 still-living participants were invited to participate in a cross-sectional follow-up study. In the absence of a gold standard diagnostic test, PTS was defined in line with clinical practice by four mandatory, predefined clinical criteria: 1. An objectively verified DVT; 2. Chronic complaints (> 1 month) in the DVT leg; 3. Complaints appeared after the DVT; and 4. An alternative diagnosis was unlikely. Possible predictors of PTS were identified with multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients (52%) were included 8-10 years following the index DVT, and 44 patients (50%) were diagnosed with PTS by the predefined clinical criteria. Younger age and higher baseline Villalta score were found to be independent predictors of PTS, i.e., OR 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99), and 1.23 (95% CI, 1.02-1.49), respectively. Lack of iliofemoral patency at six months follow-up was significant in the bivariate analysis, but did not prove to be significant after the multivariate adjustments. CONCLUSIONS: In long-term follow up after high proximal DVT, younger age and higher Villalta score at DVT diagnosis were independent predictors of PTS.

Limitations of the Villalta scale in diagnosing post-thrombotic syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: The Villalta scale is currently the recommended tool for diagnosing post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in clinical studies, but there is concern that the sensitivity and specificity of the scale might be low. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Villata scale using criteria in line with clinical practice as a reference. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We invited patients with a history of proximal DVT during 2006-09 to participate in a cross-sectional follow-up study of long-term complications after DVT. PTS was diagnosed by the Villalta scale, and by the following four mandatory and predefined clinical criteria used as a reference for PTS: 1. Objectively verified DVT; 2. chronic complaints (>1 month) in the DVT leg; 3. complaints appeared after the DVT; and 4. an alternative diagnosis was unlikely. RESULTS: We included 88 of 170 eligible patients (52%). With our clinical criteria as a reference the sensitivity and specificity of the Villalta scale for diagnosing PTS were 75% (95% CI 60-87%) and 66% (95% CI 50-80%), respectively. Fifteen patients were diagnosed with PTS by the Villalta scale only. These patients more often experienced pain or had comorbidity that could explain their leg symptoms and signs. Eleven patients diagnosed with PTS by the clinical criteria only, had more fluctuating heaviness and edema. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the diagnostic accuracy of the Villalta scale has limitations. Incorporating chronicity, whether the leg problems appeared following the DVT, fluctuations of heaviness and edema, and comorbidity in PTS assessment may improve the diagnostic accuracy.

Does the Villalta scale capture the essence of postthrombotic syndrome? A qualitative study of patient experience and expert opinion.

BACKGROUND: The Villalta scale is recommended for diagnosing and grading of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) in clinical studies, but with limitations in specificity and sensitivity. OBJECTIVES: To explore the typical complaints of PTS through patients experience and expert opinion and relate this to the items of the Villalta scale. PATIENTS/METHODS: A qualitative study design with focus group interviews including patients with PTS and health care workers experienced in PTS patient care. RESULTS: Typical PTS complaints were reflected within four main domains: (a) agonizing discomforts; patients without venous ulcers often described other discomforts than pain; (b) skin changes; these were common and sometimes present before deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Except for venous ulcers, skin changes were considered of less importance; (c) fluctuating heaviness and swelling during the day and with activity; (d) post-DVT concerns; fear of DVT recurrence, health services failing to meet the patients' expectations, and psychological and social restrictions. These findings are not necessarily captured or well reflected in the Villalta scale. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the Villalta scale does not capture typical PTS complaints or their importance to the patients. A revision of the diagnosis and grading should be considered.

Diagnostic scales for the post-thrombotic syndrome.

Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is the most common long-term complication after deep vein thrombosis (DVT) developing in up to 70% of the patients. PTS is diagnosed on the basis of typical symptoms and signs of the lower limb with a previous DVT, but no objective diagnostic test exists. A number of diagnostic scales have been developed primarily for research purposes. An optimal diagnostic test for PTS should be reliable and easy to use, sensitive and specific, able to grade PTS severity, and to identify changes over time. We have identified reports on seven diagnostic scales that have been used for the diagnosis of PTS; the Widmer classification, the Clinical-Etiological-Anatomical-Pathological (CEAP) classification, the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), the Brandjes scale, the Ginsberg measure, the Villalta scale, and the Patient-reported Villalta scale. The aim of this paper was to review and present the existing diagnostic scales for PTS in adults and their utility in clinical studies.